DC 3mper0rr-ai-vulnerability-analyzer
(no description)
Not recommendedlow grade D
name: 3mper0rr-ai-vulnerability-analyzer description: Use this skill to operate a hardened AI agent that analyzes vulnerabilities in authorized systems…
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill.md:20Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Identify attack chains and privilege escalation paths.
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill.md:65Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Red Team Analysis Mode
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill.md:72Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Evaluate privilege escalation and impact.
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill.md:119Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Previous pentest findings
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill.md:270Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Privilege escalation
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
frontmatterSKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found - error
name-missingSKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name` - error
description-missingSKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 85Steps. 22 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3133 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- +4Structure: 0 headings, hard to scan
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- -5Long text without headings
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is a high-risk but coherent vulnerability-analysis skill that emphasizes authorization, safe validation, and non-destructive handling.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 5 Sept 2026