BC doc-publisher
文档系列发布工具 - 将本地 Markdown 文档自动转换为微信公众号文章并发布
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 6
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 6
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvexamples/publish-any.js:19Reads a .env file (test fixture / example file; quoted — discussed, not commanded)console.log(' 2. 复制配置模板:copy .env.example .env');fixturequoted -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvreadme.md:21Reads a .env filecopy .env.example .env
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/supplement-doc.py:157High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)model = SentenceTransformer('para…-v2')quoted -
low Exfiltration
exfil-secret-in-urlscripts/upload-cover.js:13Credential passed in a URL query string (normal for some APIs — verify the host is the intended service) (placeholder value)const req = https.get(`https://api.weixin.qq.com/cgi-bin/token?grant_type=…&appid=…&secret=… res => {placeholder -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvskill.md:13Reads a .env filecopy .env.example .env
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvskill.md:188Reads a .env filecopy .env.example .env
Files scanned: 42. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "postInstall"
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 47 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1154 tokens
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 41: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
- -229 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -38 of 8 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 34 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 47 items
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 59.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a real WeChat document-publishing tool, but it includes unguarded draft-deletion scripts and unsafe credential handling that users should review before installing.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026