SKILLEMALL.ai

DD li-patrol-2026

(no description)

Not recommendedlow grade D
ClawHub Agent Skills author: Terry S Fisher v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 875 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

运维智能巡检系统 - 全方位自动化巡检解决方案 这是一个全面的运维智能巡检系统,支持多层级的自动化巡检,包括基础资源、中间件、容器平台、日志、业务指标等多个维度。系统会自动检测目标环境中已安装的软件和服务,仅对存在的组件进行真实巡检。

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureMySQLSoftware developmentInfrastructureWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
D
59/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
0
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege README_INSPECTION.md:209
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (test fixture / example file)
    sudo python3 intelligent_inspection.py
    fixture

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error frontmatter SKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found
  • error name-missing SKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name`
  • error description-missing SKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger

Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 48 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 875 tokens
  • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 29 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This ops inspection skill is not malware, but it needs Review because parts of its default health report are randomly generated while presented as operational findings.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 4 Jun 2026