SKILLEMALL.ai

BD scheduler

任务调度 - 定时任务/周期性任�?一次性提醒,cron语法支持,持久化存储,下次执行时间自动计�?tags: [scheduler, cron, task, reminder, automation, productivity]

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 534422530 v2.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 671 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 29 h ago

任务调度 - 定时任务/周期性任�?一次性提醒,cron语法支持,持久化存储,下次执行时间自动计�?tags: [scheduler, cron, task, reminder, automation, productivity]

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureSoftware developmentWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
83/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
57
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 4, column 14: description: 任务调度 - 定时任务/周期性任�?一次性提醒,cron语法支持,持久化存储,下次执行时间自动计�?tags: [scheduler… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "badge"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source"

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (scheduler) differs from the folder (laosi-scheduler)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 7 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1671 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 115: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a locally scoped scheduler/reminder skill with notable reliability and documentation issues, but no evidence of hidden, destructive, credential-seeking, or exfiltrating behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 30 May 2026