SKILLEMALL.ai

BD academic-language-optimizer

对论文文本进行深度学术优化,消除AI写作常见的模板化、重复性表达,使语言风格完全符合人类学者的正式、客观、严谨与委婉特点,提升文本的自然流畅度和学术辨识度。核心升级:在原有九个步骤基础上,新增“步骤零-2:Human Stylistic Calibration(人类学者用语校准)”,严格对标2024–2026年国内外医学/学术文献中人类学者(尤其是研究生/中级研究者)真实写作习惯,包括自然hedging、句子节奏多样性、上下文驱动的过渡、适度研究者立场与问题意识、避免过度名词化和模板化,确保输出达到研究生水准的学术表达。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 793943403 v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 678 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceResearchInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (academic-language-optimizer) differs from the folder (academic-rewriter-description)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 24 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 678 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 263: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a markdown-only academic rewriting skill, but it is designed to make AI-written academic text look like human scholarly writing, which creates academic integrity and authorship-disclosure risk.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026