SKILLEMALL.ai

AC story-long-analyze

长篇网文拆文。深度拆解爆款长篇小说的黄金三章、人设架构、爽点设计、节奏控制。 单一深度拆解管道:跑完黄金三章(Stage 1)后产出快速预览报告并询问是否继续全量拆解, 确认后从 Stage 2 续跑逐章摘要、聚合分析、设定关系、汇总报告,全程产物落盘 `拆文库/{书名}/`。 触发方式:/story-long-analyze、/长篇拆文、「帮我拆这本书」「拆这本书」「分析黄金三章」 「深度拆解」「完整拆解」「系统拆解」或提供小说文本文件路径——全部进入同一管道。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 9438190 v1.0.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 3 350 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 58 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3350 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 234: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 29 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 58 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a disclosed local workflow for analyzing long fiction that writes analysis files and stores source text, with no evidence of hidden install behavior, credential access, exfiltration, or destructive actions.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 13 Jul 2026