SKILLEMALL.ai

BF global-invoicing-research

生成全球开票系统的国家调研报告,输出结构化的 .docx 文档,同时服务产品经理、研发、售前三类角色。 当用户提到以下任意场景时,务必使用本 Skill: - "调研 XX 国家的开票/发票/电子发票要求" - "我要做全球开票系统,帮我调研某个国家" - "帮我生成 XX 国家的开票调研报告" - "开票合规调研"、"e-invoicing research"、"VAT invoice research" - 用户提到 KSeF、Peppol、CFDI、NF-e、GST 等具体的国家电子发票标准 即使用户没有明确说"生成报告",只要涉及对某个国家的开票要求进行结构化调研,就应使用本 Skill。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 94lfj v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 818 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/docx-template-structure.md, references/docx-coding-rules.md

ReferenceWordFinanceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/docx-template-structure.md, references/docx-coding-rules.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/docx-template-structure.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/docx-coding-rules.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/docx-template-structure.md, references/docx-coding-rules.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/docx-template-structure.md, references/docx-coding-rules.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 25 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 818 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 302: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This appears to be a disclosed invoice-research/report-writing skill, with only a minor risk that it may trigger too broadly.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026