SKILLEMALL.ai

AC agent-team

Orchestrate a dynamic multi-agent team where a lead agent (opus) plans and delegates tasks to specialized worker agents (sonnet) that communicate bidirectionally. Use when tasks benefit from parallelism or specialization — code review, market research, trading signal analysis, competitive analysis, or any complex task decomposable into parallel workstreams. Triggers on phrases like "agent team", "multi-agent", "spawn agents", "parallel agents", "team of agents", "让多个agent协作", "多智能体", "agent团队".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: AA-rick v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 090 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
93
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (agent-team) differs from the folder (xqe-agent-team)
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 20 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1090 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 499: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This appears to be a multi-agent orchestration skill whose broad activation language could start delegated workflows, including sensitive code and trading analysis, without a clear user opt-in.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026