BC karmabank
AI agents borrow USDC based on their Moltbook karma score. Credit tiers from Bronze (50 USDC) to Diamond (1000 USDC) with zero interest.
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: karmabank (ClawHub)
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokensrc/adapters/circle.test.ts:77High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (test fixture / example file; quoted — discussed, not commanded)'0x74…4e0',
fixturequoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokensrc/adapters/circle.test.ts:98High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (test fixture / example file; quoted — discussed, not commanded)'0x74…4e0',
fixturequoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokensrc/adapters/circle.test.ts:109High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (test fixture / example file; quoted — discussed, not commanded)'0x74…4e0',
fixturequoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokensrc/adapters/circle.ts:39High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)address: '0x74…4e0',
quoted
Files scanned: 32. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 51 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3065 tokens
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 136: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 48 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 51 items
- +4Has examples (40 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
KarmaBank is a coherent USDC lending skill, but its live financial paths can record fake successful transfers and rely on weak identity checks, so it needs careful review before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 10 Sept 2026