AC council-builder
Build a personalized team of AI agent personas for OpenClaw. Interviews the user, analyzes their workflow, then creates specialized agents with distinct personalities, adaptive model routing (Fast/Think/Deep/Strategic), weekly learning metrics, visual architecture docs, and inter-agent coordination. USE WHEN: user wants to create an agent team/council, build specialized AI personas, set up multi-agent workflows, 'build me a team of agents', 'create agents for my workflow', 'set up an agent council', 'I want specialized AI assistants', 'build me a crew'. DON'T USE WHEN: user wants a single skill (use skill-creator), wants to install existing skills (use clawhub), or wants to chat with existing agents (just route to them).
As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 22. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 85Steps. 82 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1902 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 730: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 82 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 10)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 95.