SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB actual

Feature-complete companion for the actual CLI, an ADR-powered CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md generator. Runs and troubleshoots actual adr-bot, status, auth, config, runners, and models. Covers all 5 runners (claude-cli, anthropic-api, openai-api, codex-cli, cursor-cli), all model patterns, all 3 output formats (claude-md, agents-md, cursor-rules), and all error types. Use when working with the actual CLI, running actual adr-bot, configuring runners or models, troubleshooting errors, or managing output files.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Actual AI v0.1.0 MIT-0 9 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 639 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
94
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Steps. 8 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2639 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 502: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 22 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 8 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is mostly coherent, but its diagnostic and sync guidance can expose sensitive auth/config details or make persistent agent-instruction changes with too little user warning.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026