SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF create-readme

Use when generating or updating a project README.md or CHANGELOG.md.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Afonso Dutra Nogueira Filho v1.0.7 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 3 304 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 15 h ago

md or CHANGELOG.md.

As a process F 46/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: url, README.pt-br.md, README.md

GeneratorGitHubDockerWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
46/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: url, README.pt-br.md, README.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Exfiltration read-dotenv SKILL.md:139
    Reads a .env file
    cp .env.example .env  # then edit values

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: url
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: README.pt-br.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: README.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 155, 230): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: url, README.pt-br.md, README.md
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: url, README.pt-br.md, README.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 26 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 85Steps. 114 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3304 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 68: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 32 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 114 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly a documentation generator, but it also tells the agent to create Git history with a hardcoded third-party attribution unrelated to the user’s project.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 12 Sept 2026