AC file-to-json-parsing
File To JSON Parsing: Parse files to JSON: CSV, HTML, JSON, ICS calendars. Use when an agent needs file to json parsing, parsing uploaded csv files into structured records for database import or api submission, extracting tabular data from html reports or web page snapshots for analysis, converting calendar ics files into event objects for scheduling integrations, processing excel spreadsheets from user uploads into json for data transformation pipelines, extract csv, input base64, file id.
File To JSON Parsing: Parse files to JSON: CSV, HTML, JSON, ICS calendars.
As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:44High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"inpu…e64": "bmFt…DI1"
quoted
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 175, 186, 257, 282): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4344 tokens
- 85Steps. 88 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 495: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 88 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (18 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.