AB pay-for-service
Make paid requests to x402-enabled APIs using USDC on Base. Use when the user explicitly asks to call a paid API, make an x402 payment, pay for a request, or fetch from a paid endpoint. Covers "call this API", "pay for", "use this service", "make a paid call".
As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, consistency, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (pay-for-service) differs from the folder (agnicpay-pay-for-service)
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 12 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 490 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 260: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.