SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC slack

Use when you need to control Slack from OpenClaw via the message tool, including reacting to messages or pinning/unpinning items in Slack channels or DMs.

The same skill from clawhub has been run on models: No improvement D see the result → This is a copy: its text may differ, so the grade is not carried over.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Yamini Chua v1.0.1 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 789 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Use the message tool with these actions to control Slack: send, react, reactions, read, edit, delete, download-file, pin, unpin, list-pins, member-info…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

ProcedureSlackOperations and projectstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (slack) differs from the folder (slack-socket)
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 85Steps. 11 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 789 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 154: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 20 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This Slack skill is mostly coherent, but it enables deleting, editing, pinning, sending, reading, and profile lookups in Slack without clear safety limits or confirmation guidance.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 12 Sept 2026