AB blockbuster-therapy-predictor
Predict which early-stage biotechnology platforms (PROTAC, mRNA, gene editing, etc.) have the highest potential to become blockbuster therapies. Analyzes clinical trial progression, patent landscape maturity, and venture capital funding trends to generate investment and R&D prioritization scores. Trigger when: User asks about technology investment potential, platform selection, or therapeutic modality comparison.
As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: failures and branches, progress reporting
How to improve
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 416 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "status" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "risk_level" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "skill_type" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "owner" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "reviewer" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "last_updated"
Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 41 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1881 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 416: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 27 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.