AF dicom-anonymizer
Batch anonymize DICOM medical images by removing patient sensitive information (name, ID, birth date) while preserving image data for research use. Trigger when users need to de-identify medical imaging data, prepare DICOM files for research sharing, or remove PHI from radiology/scanned images.
As a process F 60/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/dicom_standard_ps3.15.pdf, references/hipaa_deidentification_guide.pdf
How to improve
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 295 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/dicom_standard_ps3.15.pdf - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/hipaa_deidentification_guide.pdf - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "status" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "risk_level" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "skill_type" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "owner" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "reviewer" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "last_updated"
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/dicom_standard_ps3.15.pdf, references/hipaa_deidentification_guide.pdf
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 30Running it twice. 18 mutating operations with no state check
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 51 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2131 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 295: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 27 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 51 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.