AF lab-result-interpretation
A medical assistant tool that transforms complex biochemical laboratory test results into clear, patient-friendly explanations with safety disclaimers and severity flags.
As a process F 67/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/test_metadata.json
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/test_metadata.json - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "skill-author"
Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/test_metadata.json
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/test_metadata.json
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 51 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 7 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2055 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 19 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 170: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 22 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 51 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill appears intended to explain lab results, but some included templates overstate diagnoses or treatments and the file-reading CLI is less constrained than its documentation claims.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026