SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD openclaw-twitter-post-engage

Search X/Twitter profiles, tweets, trends, and approved engagement actions through the AISA relay. Use when: the user asks for Twitter/X research, posting, likes, follows, or related workflows without sharing passwords. Supports read APIs, OAuth-gated posting, and follow or like operations.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: AIsa v2.0.4 MIT-0 8 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 753 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Search X/Twitter profiles, tweets, trends, and approved engagement actions through the AISA relay.

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "primaryEnv"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "requires"
    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 61): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 24 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 753 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 291: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 3 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is mostly transparent about Twitter/X relay use, but needs review because media uploads can send arbitrary readable local files and the relay API key is redundantly placed in request bodies.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 15 Sept 2026