SKILLEMALL.ai

AC stock-selecter

统一选股技能包,整合14种策略(ROE筛选、MACD底背离、高股息、低估值、 费雪成长股、长期低位、近期放量、趋势分析、K线形态、布林带下轨、筹码集中、 现金流质量、北向资金、股东增持、分析师目标价),支持单策略、多策略组合筛选。 触发词(精准触发,覆盖明确选股意图): 按策略名:ROE选股、ROE筛选、MACD选股、MACD筛选、MACD底背离、 股息选股、高股息选股、估值选股、低估值、成长股筛选、费雪成长股、 低位放量选股、长期低位选股、近期放量、趋势选股、形态选股、K线形态筛选、 布林带选股、筹码集中选股、现金流质量、北向资金选股、股东增持选股、分析师目标价选股 按组合意图:组合选股、筛选股票、多策略选股、综合选股、并发选股、全部策略选股 按结果要求:按ROE排名、按评分排名、按股息率排名、取交集、取并集 明确排除(这些场景应激活其他skill): - 任何包含具体股票代码/名称的个股分析请求 - "帮我看看XX股票"、"XX公司怎么样"、"XX值不值得买" - "查一下行情"、"看资金流向"等纯数据查询

ClawHub Agent Skills author: alan1121-J v3.3.2 MIT-0 29 files body ≈ 2 021 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 29. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 12 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2021 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 462: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
  • +4Has examples (20 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The stock-screening skill is broadly coherent, but it needs Review because it sends the Tushare token over plain HTTP and one strategy appears to mislabel company repurchase data as shareholder or manager buying signals.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026