SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF alltoken-call

Six slash-style AllToken commands — /alltoken-chat, /alltoken-image, /alltoken-video, /alltoken-search, /alltoken-models, /alltoken-cost — recognized in chat and run via stdlib Python recipes. Pair with alltoken for full project bootstrap.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: AllToken v1.0.0 MIT-0 1 file body ≈ 4 280 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 51/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../alltoken/SKILL.md, ../alltoken/USAGE.md

ProcedureMedia and videoSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
51/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../alltoken/SKILL.md, ../alltoken/USAGE.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../alltoken/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../alltoken/USAGE.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../alltoken/SKILL.md, ../alltoken/USAGE.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: ../alltoken/SKILL.md, ../alltoken/USAGE.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4280 tokens
  • 100Steps. 34 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 10 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 239: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
  • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This appears to be a purpose-aligned AllToken command helper, but it uses an AllToken API key and runs local Python snippets that send user prompts to AllToken.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026