BF black-fortress
Pre-installation agentic sandboxing protocol. 5-layer defense: semantic neutralization, hard quarantine, kernel ground-truth, trusted output rendering, and sterile autopsy.
As a process F 47/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: LICENSE
GeneratorDockerInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegescripts/behavioral_audit.py:51Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (string literal in code, not executed; documentation of a security skill)"setuid", "setgid", "setreuid", "setregid",
code literalsecurity skill -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:144Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| `/bin/sh` / `/bin/bash` | ❌ | No reverse shell, no `os.system()` |
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:149Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| UID 0 (root) | ❌ | No privilege escalation |
Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 172 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5766 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: LICENSE - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "required_commands" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "required_environment_variables" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "required_privileges" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "docker_image" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "docker_image_source"
Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: LICENSE
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: LICENSE
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 15 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Consistency. The Hermes dialect needs category and tags
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5766 tokens
- 100Steps. 74 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 5 branches, has a failure section
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -215 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -32 of 9 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 172: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 41 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 74 items
- +4Has examples (18 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 55.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This is a defensive local sandboxing skill, but it overstates important protections and asks users to trust high-impact Docker/root workflows that are not fully implemented or scoped.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026