SKILLEMALL.ai

BD kurobbs-wiki

库街区(kurobbs)鸣潮 WIKI 资料查询 + 查看自己账号角色。当用户询问鸣潮(游戏)的角色/共鸣者、武器、武器投影、声骸、合鸣效果、敌人、全息战略、合成道具、任务/活动/特殊道具、补给、资源、素材、角色攻略、玩法攻略、区域探索、新手入门、版本攻略等图鉴或攻略信息时使用;也可通过 my 命令登录库街区账号查看自己拥有的角色(my roles)、用自己角色配队(my team)。可列出分类下的条目、获取词条详情、按名称搜索词条,全部通过公开 JSON API 查询。★ 注意:鸣潮 WIKI 查询无需登录;但查"我有什么角色/我的账号角色"需要 my login 登录一次。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Alphamancer v0.1.0 MIT-0 14 files body ≈ 4 503 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

库街区(kurobbs)鸣潮 WIKI 资料查询 + 查看自己账号角色。当用户询问鸣潮(游戏)的角色/共鸣者、武器、武器投影、声骸、合鸣效果、敌人、全息战略、合成道具、任务/活动/特殊道具、补给、资源、素材、角色攻略、玩法攻略、区域探索、新手入门、版本攻略等图鉴或攻略信息时使用;也可通过 my…

As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationPlaywrightAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
44/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security README.en.md:149
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    ├── post_fetch.py      # Community post media fetching (Playwright to bypass WAF)

Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4503 tokens
  • 100Steps. 102 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • -238 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -31 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 292: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 24 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 102 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This game wiki helper has useful disclosed features, but it needs Review because it bypasses site protections, downloads/processes media, and stores account login data locally in plaintext.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 14 Aug 2026