SKILLEMALL.ai

AC openclaw-security-audit

Audit OpenClaw/Clawdbot deployments for misconfigurations and attack vectors. Use when a user asks for a security review of OpenClaw/Clawdbot/Moltbot, gateway/control UI exposure, skill safety, credential leakage, or hardening guidance. Produces a terminal report with OK/VULNERABLE findings and fixes.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: AlvisDunlop v1.0.5 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 416 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, consistency

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
96
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: openclaw-security-audit (ClawHub)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 4

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 4
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:110
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      ### 8) File Permissions & Privilege Escalation Risks
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:114
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      2. Identify SUID/SGID binaries (potential privesc):

    A further 2 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (openclaw-security-audit) differs from the folder (alvis-security-auditor)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Failures and branches. 5 branches
    • 100Steps. 75 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1416 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 302: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 18 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 75 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a read-only OpenClaw security audit guide whose sensitive local checks match its stated purpose and are clearly constrained to reporting.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026