SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB ai-retrospective

AI Collaboration Retrospective — a tool-agnostic post-session analysis framework. After each AI-assisted coding/development session, it systematically reviews the entire conversation across eight dimensions to identify improvement opportunities and generate a structured retrospective report. Core goal: make every AI session better than the last.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Amos v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 2 291 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, consistency

AnalyzerOperations and projectstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"

Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (ai-retrospective) differs from the folder (ai-retrospective-skill)
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 33 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 11 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2291 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 347: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is an instruction-only retrospective skill, but it can review the full chat and automatically write reports or persistent memory without a clear approval step.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026