AD tts
Convert text to speech using Hume AI (or OpenAI) API. Use when the user asks for an audio message, a voice reply, or to hear something "of vive voix".
As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
IntegrationAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/package-lock.json:37High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…ibj+tODHI5/+l06Au2Pcriv/Gmet…weg==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/package-lock.json:49High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…8fQ+wE2m…hIQ==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/package-lock.json:61High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…9dM/mwVgvbZJaSNaRk+bshk…Kbz+IoId…W0Q==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/package-lock.json:80High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…SDq+2kAA…MOe/+5cdoEdg==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/package-lock.json:124High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…FrF+LTRo…W3g==",
detector
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 6 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 181 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 150: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 5 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This text-to-speech skill has a coherent purpose, but its documented command usage can expose users to command execution and arbitrary file overwrite risks if user-controlled text or output paths are passed through a shell.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 10 Sept 2026