SKILLEMALL.ai

AC memory-lifecycle

Systematic memory management for long-running AI agents. Implements a five-tier lifecycle — heartbeat micro-attention, nightly consolidation, weekly reflection, monthly archiving, and yearly wisdom distillation. Use when setting up a new agent's memory system, improving an existing agent's memory quality, or when the agent's MEMORY.md is growing too large and context quality is degrading. Triggers on "set up memory", "memory management", "improve memory", "memory lifecycle", "nightly consolidation", "sleep cycle", "memory housekeeping".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: andrewagrahamhodges v1.1.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 1 312 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
96
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (memory-lifecycle) differs from the folder (agent-memory-lifecycle)
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 39 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1312 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 542: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 96.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill does what it says, but it can keep changing an agent’s memory on a schedule and may preserve sensitive details, so it needs review before installation.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026