SKILLEMALL.ai

AD ai-image-prompt

AI 图片提示词优化、高质感提示词写作、高保真参考图融合与 1:1 还原技能。当用户说“ao”、要求根据上传图片生成更精准/更全面/更详细/更有质感的提示词、 严格复刻模特/产品/场景、精确模仿参考图、完全参考上传模特风格、让人物更自然真实、增强人像真实感、修复提示词被平台判定违规/无法生成的问题、指定产品位置与角度、优化产品摄影/人像摄影/电商视觉、 生成电商主图/详情页/九宫格/四视图/模特图、需要轻奢/法式/运动/极简/买手店风品牌语气、 优化 Flux / Nonbana / Nano Banana / Midjourney 提示词,或需要贴身服饰/家居服/男士贴身下装等商业拍摄提示词时触发。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: aolio516125-spec v1.0.0 MIT-0 28 files body ≈ 2 684 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

AI 图片提示词优化、高质感提示词写作、高保真参考图融合与 1:1 还原技能。当用户说“ao”、要求根据上传图片生成更精准/更全面/更详细/更有质感的提示词、…

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (ai-image-prompt) differs from the folder (nextory)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 222 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2684 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 21 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 304: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 24 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 222 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (18 of 25)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This prompt-writing skill is not executable malware, but it teaches agents to disguise blocked sensitive image requests so generation platforms are more likely to accept them.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 9 Jul 2026