SKILLEMALL.ai

BD APM 상품 관리 API

APM 플랫폼의 상품 관리 API 모음. 관리자용 상품 추가/삭제/수정/가격·재고·할인 관리 17개 + 사용자용 상품 조회/검색/카테고리/추천/유사 상품/이미지 검색 16개, 총 33개 엔드포인트. 모든 엔드포인트는 먼저 ids_*_login으로 access_token 획득 후 authcode 헤더(HH + token)로 호출. last_update_time 커서 페이지네이션 사용. 중국어/한국어 키워드 검색 지원.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: apmzoom v1.0.0 MIT-0 35 files body ≈ 1 144 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 35. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (APM 상품 관리 API) differs from the folder (apmzoom-gds)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 43 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1144 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 234: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 4 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a coherent APM product-management API skill, but it gives agents access to live catalog changes and sensitive tokens without enough safety guidance.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026