SKILLEMALL.ai

AA business-impact-analysis-bia

Use this skill when a resilience, continuity, audit, or process owner wants to draft or review an ISO 22301 / NIST-aligned Business Impact Analysis. Covers process inventory, impact-over-time scoring, RTO/RPO/MTPD/MBCO/WRT, dependency mapping, gap analysis, and steering-committee sign-off boundaries.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: devasher v0.1.3 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 6 482 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Covers process inventory, impact-over-time scoring, RTO/RPO/MTPD/MBCO/WRT, dependency mapping, gap analysis, and steering-committee sign-off boundaries.

As a process A 83/100 · Runs to the end — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice

ProcedureInfrastructureData and analyticsSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
A
83/100
Runs to the end
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
Inputs and preconditions w 11
70
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:327
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - **Do not opine** on whether the BCMS satisfies a regulator (OSFI E-21, APRA CPS 230, FFIEC BCM examination, DORA threat-led penetration testing scope, ENISA NIS2, MAS TRM, PRA SS1/21), whether an au

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 6482 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 83/100

  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 29 mutating operations with no state check
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6482 tokens
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 76 steps
  • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
  • 100Failures and branches. 5 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 301: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 76 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a documentation-only business continuity drafting skill whose sensitive data handling is expected for its purpose and clearly bounded.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 May 2026