AC concussion-return-to-play-protocol
Use this skill when a team physician, athletic trainer, or sports clinician needs to draft a graduated Return-to-Sport and Return-to-Learn plan for a concussed athlete. Aligned to CISG 2023 and SCAT6; produces a DRAFT 6-step RTS / 4-step RTL plan with stage minimums and regression rules for qualified-HCP review — never clears an athlete to play.
As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenCHANGELOG.md:9High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)Initial release. Drafts an individualized graduated Return-to-Sport (RTS) and parallel Return-to-Learn (RTL) staged plan for a concussed athlete aligned to the CISG 2023 Amsterdam consensus and SCAT6,
detector
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Failures and branches. 5 branches
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4172 tokens
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 76 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 347: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 76 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.