AA dpia-drafter
Use this skill when a DPO, privacy counsel, or controller representative needs to draft a GDPR Article 35 Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA). Covers threshold determination, EDPB harmonised template sections 0–4, risk scoring, and produces a DRAFT DPIA with prior-consultation recommendation for DPO review and controller sign-off.
As a process A 80/100 · Runs to the end — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:187Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| Data loss / unavailability | Ransomware, deletion, no backup |
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 80/100
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Failures and branches. 14 branches
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4021 tokens
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 23 steps
- 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 337: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 28 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.