AC eu-ai-act-risk-classification-memo
Use this skill when an AI-governance lead, in-house counsel, DPO, or product owner needs to draft a risk-classification memo for an AI system under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Walks Article 5 prohibited-practice screen, Annex III high-risk mapping, GPAI tier, and produces a counsel-ready memo with a dated action checklist through August 2027.
Use this skill when an AI-governance lead, in-house counsel, DPO, or product owner needs to draft a risk-classification memo for an AI system under the EU AI…
As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5830 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 86): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 16 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5830 tokens
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 40 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 359: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 22 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.