SKILLEMALL.ai

AB genetic-counseling-session-note

Use this skill when a board-certified genetic counselor (CGC, MS), CGC candidate, or supervising clinical geneticist needs to draft a pre-test or post-test genetic counseling session note. Covers pedigree narrative, risk quantification, test rationale, informed consent documentation, result disclosure, psychosocial assessment, patient understanding check, and clinical plan. Produces a DRAFT note for licensed CGC review before EMR entry or billing use.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: devasher v0.1.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 2 328 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 27 h ago

Use this skill when a board-certified genetic counselor (CGC, MS), CGC candidate, or supervising clinical geneticist needs to draft a pre-test or post-test…

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

AnalyzerWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
    • 85Steps. 42 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2328 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 455: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 23 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    No malicious or suspicious behavior was supported by the supplied scanner evidence or available workspace context.
    LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 2 Jun 2026