SKILLEMALL.ai

AC geo-first-seo

Use this skill when the user wants to make content more likely to be cited or surfaced by AI answer engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Copilot) — i.e. Generative Engine Optimization / GEO / "AI SEO". Covers an end-to-end workflow: GEO strategy and query research, creating new GEO-optimized content or auditing/rewriting an existing page or article, technical markup (schema.org JSON-LD, llms.txt, FAQ/heading structure), and a GEO scorecard. Not for traditional keyword-ranking SEO audits, paid ads, or link-building campaigns.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: devasher v0.1.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 947 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 26 h ago

e. Generative Engine Optimization / GEO / "AI SEO". Covers an end-to-end workflow: GEO strategy and query research, creating new GEO-optimized content or…

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

GeneratorMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 25 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1947 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 552: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a documentation-only GEO content workflow that asks for limited, purpose-matched web research and explicitly avoids fabrication, publishing, or hidden SEO tactics.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 2 Jun 2026