SKILLEMALL.ai

AC robotics-vla

Expert guidance for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) robot foundation models — covering architecture design, training pipelines, data strategy, deployment, and evaluation. Use when (1) designing or implementing a generalist robot policy (VLA model), (2) setting up pre-training or fine-tuning pipelines for robot manipulation, (3) choosing action representations (flow matching vs. diffusion vs. autoregressive), (4) structuring multi-embodiment robot datasets, (5) evaluating dexterous manipulation tasks, (6) implementing action chunking or high-level policy decomposition. Based on the pi0 architecture (Physical Intelligence, 2024).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: arden2010 v1.1.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 818 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 20 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 818 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 632: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    The available evidence shows no artifact-backed security concern; the advisory scan is clean and VirusTotal is only pending telemetry.
    LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026