BC flight-requirement-review
机票产品需求评审 Agent。对前端、后端、运营类机票需求文档进行结构化评审打分，含独立的流程图治理评审（去If化、卫语句、决策表、FSM、泳道图、分层建模）。输入需求文档（markdown/图片/HTML），输出分项评分、评语和改进建议。使用场景：用户说"评审需求"、"审需求文档"、"给需求打分"、"需求评审"、"评审流程图"、"检查流程图"、"流程图打分"时触发。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 31 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1433 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 185: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 16 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is a coherent Convex performance-audit skill with disclosed, purpose-aligned behavior and no hidden execution or persistence.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026