SKILLEMALL.ai

AF dify

Use when managing a self-hosted Dify instance, checking feature feasibility, or orchestrating apps, prompts, datasets, and knowledge-base operations via the dify-manager MCP server.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Alexander Schneider v1.3.0 MIT-0 11 files body ≈ 2 975 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../dify-workflow/SKILL.md

ProcedureGitHubAI and agentsInfrastructureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../dify-workflow/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../dify-workflow/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../dify-workflow/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../dify-workflow/SKILL.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (dify) differs from the folder (dify-orchestrator)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Steps. 132 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2975 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The skill ranks results itself: that belongs to the system behind the tool, not the model

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 181: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 32 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 132 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed Dify administration helper that can change a self-hosted Dify instance, but the behavior is purpose-aligned and guarded by user checks.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026