SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CD escalation-governance

Assess whether to escalate models

ClawHub Agent Skills author: athola v1.9.19 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 928 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 10 d ago

Assess whether to escalate models

As a process D 38/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
83/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
58
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
38/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-short description under 40 chars: too little signal for triggering
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source_plugin"
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 225, 249): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (escalation-governance) differs from the folder (nm-abstract-escalation-governance)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 85Steps. 41 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2928 tokens
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 33: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 58.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a Markdown-only guide for deciding when to use more capable models, with no code execution, data access, persistence, or hidden install behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Sept 2026