SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB api-review

Evaluates API surface design, consistency, and exemplar alignment

ClawHub Agent Skills author: athola v1.9.19 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 958 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, consistency

IntegrationGitHubInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
65
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
69/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Consistency w 8
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source_plugin"

Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (api-review) differs from the folder (nm-pensive-api-review)
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 11 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 958 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 65: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a documented API review workflow with broad activation terms but no hidden, destructive, or credential-seeking behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 26 Aug 2026