SKILLEMALL.ai

AD gitcode-issue-reply

Generate reply drafts for a single GitCode issue with similar-issue references; maintainer reviews before posting. Use when user asks to reply to or comment on an issue and provides a GitCode issue link; do not use when user only wants to fetch or query issue data. 针对单个 GitCode Issue 生成回复草稿(含相似 Issue 参考),维护者审阅后可发送评论;仅当用户要回复或评论且提供链接时使用,仅获取或查询 issue 信息时勿用。Python 3.7+ standard library only.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: do_while_true v1.2.0 MIT-0 13 files body ≈ 1 263 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorInfrastructureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 62 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1263 tokens
    • low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -35 of 7 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 390: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 20 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 62 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is a GitCode issue reply assistant, but it needs review because it can post comments, send issue text to DeepWiki, download issue images, and retain issue data locally.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026