SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF shieldadvanced

Configures AWS Shield Advanced for enhanced Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection: subscribing accounts and adding resource protections, enabling automatic application layer (layer 7) mitigation through AWS WAF, configuring health-based detection with Route 53 health checks, setting up Shield Response Team (SRT) access and proactive engagement, reviewing DDoS events and requesting cost protection credits, and aggregating resources into protection groups. Applicable when the user wants stronger DDoS protection for internet-facing resources (CloudFront, Application or Network Load Balancers, Elastic IP addresses, Global Accelerator, or Route 53 hosted zones), wants expert help during an attack, or wants to recover attack-driven scaling charges. Routes to the right per-task procedure in references. Not applicable for authoring AWS WAF rules (waf skill), creating Route 53 health checks (route53 skill), or org-wide Shield Advanced rollout with Firewall Manager (firewallmanager skill).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Amazon Web Services 1 file body ≈ 1 928 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 34 h ago

Configures AWS Shield Advanced for enhanced Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection: subscribing accounts and adding resource protections, enabling…

As a process F 53/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/deciding-between-shield-standard-and-advanced.md, references/subscribing-to-shield-advanced-and-protecting-resources.md, references/enabling-automatic-application-layer-mitigation.md

ProcedureAWSInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
53/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/deciding-between-shield-standard-and-advanced.md, references/subscribing-to-shield-advanced-and-protecting-resources.md, references/enabling-automatic-application-layer-mitigation.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/deciding-between-shield-standard-and-advanced.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/subscribing-to-shield-advanced-and-protecting-resources.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/enabling-automatic-application-layer-mitigation.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/configuring-health-based-detection.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/setting-up-srt-support-and-proactive-engagement.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/reviewing-ddos-events-and-requesting-cost-protection.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/aggregating-resources-into-protection-groups.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/deciding-between-shield-standard-and-advanced.md, references/subscribing-to-shield-advanced-and-protecting-resources.md, references/enabling-automatic-application-layer-mitigation.md
  • 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: references/deciding-between-shield-standard-and-advanced.md, references/subscribing-to-shield-advanced-and-protecting-resources.md, references/enabling-automatic-application-layer-mitigation.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 18 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1928 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 1004: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 7 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
  • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.