DC pihole
(no description)
Not recommendedlow grade D
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, progress reporting
How to improve
- Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSECURITY_AUDIT.md:64Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (documentation of a security skill)curl -H "X-Auth-Token: $TOKEN"
security skill -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSECURITY_AUDIT.md:67Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (documentation of a security skill)curl -d "{\"password\":\"$TOKEN\"}"security skill
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
frontmatterSKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found - error
name-missingSKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name` - error
description-missingSKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 29 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1183 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 24 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 29 items
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This Pi-hole control skill is mostly purpose-aligned, but it has real security-control and credential-handling problems users should review before installing.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 10 Sept 2026