BF java-unit-test
Java 单元测试**规范对齐**助手。在编写、评审、补全单元测试时使用本技能—— 无论用户是否提到具体框架（unit test / JUnit / Mockito / 测试用例 / 怎么测 / 测哪些 / 写多少测试）。 核心：统一团队的测试规范——用同一套设计方法（等价类/边界值/决策表/状态迁移）、 同一套默认（JUnit 5 原生断言、四维度必检）、同一套"写多少"的停止标准， 让不同人/不同对话产出的测试质量一致、可溯源、可审计，而非每次碰运气。 覆盖：一个方法必测的四维度（正向/反向/边界/异常）、最小充分集、 覆盖率反向校验、测试命名与组织、Mock 边界、"写多少"的成本收益判定。 次级触发信号：只写 happy path、补测试不知道写几个、手写一堆重复 @Test、 多条件分支只测一两种、有状态对象只测正常流转、@MockBean 用于纯单测、 不确定测试该写到什么程度。 工具默认：断言默认用 JUnit 5 原生 Assertions，仅在集合内容断言/字段分组断言（同一逻辑组）时升级到 AssertJ； Spring Boot 项目走 spring-boot-starter-test（自带 JUnit5+Mockito）。 不适用：集成测试/E2E（@SpringBootTest 全量上下文）、性能测试、前端测试。
Java 单元测试规范对齐助手。在编写、评审、补全单元测试时使用本技能—— 无论用户是否提到具体框架（unit test / JUnit / Mockito / 测试用例 / 怎么测 / 测哪些 / 写多少测试）。 核心：统一团队的测试规范——用同一套设计方法（等价类/边界值/决策表/状态迁移）、…
As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/06, references/01, references/02
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/06 - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/01 - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/02 - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/03 - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/04 - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "last_verified"
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
- 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: references/06, references/01, references/02
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 31 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1745 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 578: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.