SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF pdf-ocr-layout

(no description)

ClawHub Agent Skills author: baokui v1.0.2 6 files body ≈ 850 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/glm_ocr_extract.py, scripts/glm_understanding.py

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
81/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
53
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/glm_ocr_extract.py, scripts/glm_understanding.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Multimodal document deep analysis tool based on Zhipu GLM-OCR, GLM… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/glm_ocr_extract.py
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/glm_understanding.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/glm_ocr_extract.py, scripts/glm_understanding.py
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/glm_ocr_extract.py, scripts/glm_understanding.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 100Steps. 13 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 850 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +3All 3 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 53.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill does what it advertises: it sends user-selected documents to Zhipu GLM services for OCR and analysis, then saves extracted outputs locally.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026