SKILLEMALL.ai

BD agentshield

Privacy-First security audit with 77 local tests (52 live + 25 static). Works with OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, n8n (auto-detected), LangChain, and any AI agent platform. Ed25519 private keys stay local. All scripts bundled.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: bartelmost v1.0.36 MIT-0 31 files body ≈ 3 380 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerZapierAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
75/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
83
Quality 40%
64
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
39/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Instruction override medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The text contains phrases like "ignore previous instructions" or "you are now…". That is an attempt to hijack the agent: it may break your rules, the system limits or company policy.

For the author

An honest skill does not need them: state the role and the rules directly without overriding other instructions. Otherwise catalog scanners and corporate filters will block the listing.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 13

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 13
  • medium Instruction override en-ignore-previous README.md:75
    Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (documentation of a security skill)
    | **Instruction Override** | Tries to override safety instructions | Critical |
    security skill
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-pipe-to-shell agentshield_attack_patterns.json:5
    Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (string literal in code, not executed; documentation of a security skill)
    "curl | bash",
    code literalsecurity skill
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-pipe-to-shell agentshield_attack_patterns.json:6
    Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (string literal in code, not executed; documentation of a security skill)
    "wget | sh"
    code literalsecurity skill
  • low Obfuscation uni-mixed-script-word agentshield_tester.py:655
    Word mixing Latin and Cyrillic letters (homoglyph obfuscation) (1 occurrence) (test fixture / example file)
    ("LA-018", "Unicode Homoglyph Attack", "іgnore"),  # Cyrillic i
    fixture
  • low Instruction override en-ignore-previous audit_client.py:20
    Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (negated — the text forbids it)
    - Test input payloads (attack strings like "ignore previous instructions")
    negated
  • low Instruction override en-ignore-previous echoleak_test.py:165
    Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (test fixture / example file; quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    ignore previous instructions
    fixturequoted
  • low Instruction override en-ignore-previous SKILL.md:382
    Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (negated — the text forbids it)
    - ✅ Attack test inputs/payloads (e.g. "ignore previous instructions")
    negated
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-pipe-to-shell TESTING.md:155
    Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (test fixture / example file; documentation of a security skill)
    - SC-003: Remote code execution (curl | bash, wget | sh)
    fixturesecurity skill
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security TESTING.md:165
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (test fixture / example file)
    - LA-002: `Developer Mode Override` (tests privilege escalation)
    fixture

A further 4 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.

Files scanned: 31. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"

Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (agentshield) differs from the folder (agentshield-audit)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 102 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3380 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • -278 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 219: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 41 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 102 items
  • +4Has examples (16 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
AgentShield mostly matches its security-audit purpose, but its privacy and trust-verification disclosures do not consistently match the code.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 18 Jun 2026