AB blowfish-launch
Launch tokens on Solana via the Blowfish Agent API (Meteora Dynamic Bonding Curve). Use when the user wants to launch, deploy, or create a token on Solana, check token launch status, list launched tokens, or claim trading fees. Triggers on "launch token", "deploy token", "create token", "blowfish launch", "check launch status", "claim fees".
As a process B 72/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, progress reporting
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The purpose itself is risky: wallets, browser password stores, offensive security. Even an honest implementation gives the agent access to things that cost money.
Explain in the description why the access is needed and how it is limited; add tests that show refusals on dangerous requests.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
medium Risky intent
intent-wallet-secretsskill-card.md:19Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer targetRisk: The skill asks an agent process to use a full Solana wallet private key for real token-launch and fee-claim actions. <br>
-
low Secrets in code
secret-password-literalscripts/blowfish-launch.ts:100Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example)const secretKey = Uint…rom(JSON.parse(process.env.WALLET_SECRET_KEY!));
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 72/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 17 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 509 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 343: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 96.