SKILLEMALL.ai

BC beatra-ai-image-studio

Create and refine images from a written brief, one to four ordered reference images, or an existing base image. Beatra AI Image Studio supports text-to-image generation, reference-guided composition, and focused AI image editing for product photos, ad creative, brand visuals, posters, social graphics, illustrations, concept art, and photo background changes. Review each generated image for message, subject fidelity, composition, style, text, and destination fit, then choose the smallest useful edit, new composition, or new generation.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: beatra-ai v1.1.3 MIT-0 17 files body ≈ 2 780 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Create and refine images from a written brief, one to four ordered reference images, or an existing base image.

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorDesignMarketingWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 17. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 22 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2780 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -32 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 540: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (11 of 11)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This image skill is mostly coherent, but it grants and stores broad account authority and silently self-updates local package files by default.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 20 Aug 2026