SKILLEMALL.ai

BC ecommerce-listing-image-set

Turn verified SKU facts and product photos into AI product listing images: a coordinated ecommerce image set for Amazon listing images, Shopify product images, Etsy listing photos, and online marketplaces. Build a product image set with a hero image, feature and detail visuals, lifestyle product photography, size and fit views, and packaging or in-box images for new launches, storefronts, and product pages.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: beatra-ai v0.1.9 MIT-0 16 files body ≈ 2 619 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

Turn verified SKU facts and product photos into AI product listing images: a coordinated ecommerce image set for Amazon listing images, Shopify product…

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

AnalyzerShopifyCommercetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 18 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2619 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -32 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 410: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (10 of 10)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This image-generation skill is disclosed and mostly coherent, but it needs Review because it requests broad Beatra account powers and can silently replace its own package files.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 6 Sept 2026