SKILLEMALL.ai

BC agent-decision

AI Agent开发决策辅助系统。用户提出Agent应用想法,自动从技术选型、竞品格局、市场前景、行业趋势、开发可行性、系统稳定性、成本预算、推广策略8大维度进行综合分析,生成专业交互式HTML可行性决策报告。覆盖LLM选型/Agent框架/架构模式/幻觉控制/Token成本/RAG方案/Prompt工程/评测体系等Agent开发专属议题。触发词:Agent决策, Agent可行性, Agent开发, 做Agent应用, AI Agent评估, 智能体决策, 搭建Agent, Agent分析报告, agent decision, AI助手开发, 多智能体系统, Agent选型。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: bettermen v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 1 152 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

AI…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_tools"

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 41 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1152 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 292: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 12 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill matches its stated report-generation purpose, but broad activation phrases and unsafe active HTML report generation warrant review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Jun 2026